Skip to main content

Summary of Knowledge and Wisdom by Bertrand Russell

 

Knowledge and Wisdom 

Bertrand Russell 

Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) was a British philosopher and logician known for his work in mathematical logic and analytic philosophy. He contributed to logicism, refined predicate calculus, and supported neutral monism (the theory that denies the existence of a duality in a particular sphere such as that between God and the world). He also developed theories of definite descriptions, logical atomism, and logical types.

In his essay, Russell distinguishes between knowledge and wisdom. He says that knowledge is about acquiring information, while wisdom is about using that knowledge practically to create value. Wisdom comes from learning and experience, not just memorizing facts.

Although we have more knowledge today than ever before, we haven't necessarily become wiser. Defining wisdom and finding ways to promote it can be challenging. First, let's consider what wisdom is and how it can be taught.

Wisdom involves several elements, with one of the most important being a sense of proportion: the ability to consider all important aspects of a problem and give each the appropriate weight. This is harder now because of the complex and specialized knowledge needed in various fields. For example, a medical researcher might focus solely on reducing infant mortality without considering the larger impact, such as food shortages due to population growth. Another example is scientists studying atoms out of a pure desire for knowledge, which unintentionally leads to the creation of powerful weapons. These cases show that knowledge can be harmful if not paired with wisdom, as experts may lack a broad perspective on the consequences of their work.

To be wise, it's not enough to have broad knowledge; one must also understand the purpose of human life. For example, some historians, despite their vast knowledge, have caused harm by interpreting facts through their own biases. Hegel, a philosopher of history, had a comprehensive view, covering from ancient times to the future. However, his main belief was that Germany had been the world's leading nation since 400 AD. True wisdom might include both broad knowledge and a broad range of emotions. People who have extensive knowledge but narrow feelings lack true wisdom.

Wisdom is important not only in public life but also in personal matters. It helps us choose worthwhile goals and frees us from personal biases. Even noble goals can be pursued unwisely if they are impossible to achieve, like the search for the philosopher's stone or the elixir of life in the past, which led to wasted lives.

In a more everyday example, consider two men, Mr. A and Mr. B, who hate each other. If you ask each why they hate the other, both will give reasons that mix truth and lies. Telling each one that the other says the same things about them may initially increase their hatred. However, with patience and persuasion, you might help them see that their hatred is unnecessary and harmful, leading them to realize a bit of wisdom.

The essence of wisdom is freeing ourselves from focusing only on the present moment. While our senses and emotions are naturally tied to our own bodies and experiences, true wisdom comes when we learn to think beyond our personal concerns. As people grow older, they often become less self-centered and more understanding of the world around them. Although no one can be completely unbiased, we can strive to be more impartial (unbiased) by understanding things that are distant in time or space and by giving them the right importance in our feelings. This journey towards impartiality is what makes us wiser.

Wisdom, in this sense, can be taught and should be a goal of education. While we are taught to love our neighbors as ourselves, in reality, society often promotes hatred. To truly understand this teaching, we should see our neighbors as people we might naturally disagree with, like a Communist or anti-Communist, rather than just thinking of someone from a distant past like a Samaritan (a charitable or helpful person).

The author argues that hating those who do harm is not the right approach. Hatred can make us just as harmful and is unlikely to make others change their ways. Instead, understanding is the way to overcome evil. While resistance to evil is necessary, it should involve as much understanding and as little force as possible. The author also disagrees with the idea that this approach is weak. Historical figures like Queen Elizabeth I and Henry IV, who avoided the fanaticism (militancy) of their time, were both effective and beneficial leaders. Abraham Lincoln, too, led a war wisely without resorting to hatred.

Wisdom can be taught, and it should include more intellectual content than typical moral lessons. Understanding the harmful effects of hatred and narrow-mindedness can be integrated into learning. Knowledge and morals should not be separated too much. Although specialized skills aren't directly linked to wisdom, education should also offer broader perspectives to understand their role in human life. Good professionals should also be good global citizens. As knowledge and skills grow, wisdom becomes more crucial because it helps us use our abilities wisely. The world urgently needs wisdom, and this need will grow as knowledge continues to increase.

SHORT SUMMARY:
About the Author:

Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) was a British philosopher, logician, and social critic. He was best known for his work in mathematical logic and analytic philosophy. Russell made significant contributions to the field of logic, including developing the theory that mathematics can be reduced to logic. He refined the predicate calculus, which is still used in modern logic, and supported the idea of neutral monism, which suggests that the universe is made up of a single substance that is neither purely mental nor purely physical. He also developed theories about definite descriptions, logical atomism, and logical types.

Summary:

In this essay, Bertrand Russell explores the difference between knowledge and wisdom. While they are related, they are not the same. Knowledge is about collecting information, whereas wisdom is about using that information effectively and ethically. Despite the increase in knowledge over time, wisdom has not grown at the same rate. Russell argues that true wisdom requires more than just learning and memorization; it also comes from real-world experiences.

Wisdom involves understanding the bigger picture, which Russell calls a "sense of proportion." This means considering all the factors in a situation, not just focusing narrowly on one aspect. For example, scientists might create new medicines, but without wisdom, they might not foresee the social or ethical implications, such as overpopulation or resource shortages. Russell points out that knowledge without wisdom can be dangerous, as it could lead to harmful outcomes.

Russell believes that knowledge should be connected to the broader needs of humanity and linked to a deeper understanding of life’s purpose. He uses the example of Hegel, a philosopher with great historical knowledge, who promoted the idea of German superiority, which led to conflict and war. Therefore, it is essential to balance knowledge with empathy and understanding.

Both public and private life require wisdom. It helps us set meaningful goals and avoid personal biases. Without wisdom, people might chase unrealistic dreams or hold onto prejudices, leading to unnecessary conflicts. For example, two people might remain enemies due to misunderstanding each other’s flaws. Russell argues that we can overcome hatred by using reason and empathy. He suggests that wisdom grows when we start to care about others and not just ourselves.

Russell also believes that wisdom can be taught and should be an essential part of education. Stories like the Good Samaritan teach us to love and understand our neighbors, regardless of their background. Historical figures like Queen Elizabeth I, Henry IV, and Abraham Lincoln are examples of leaders who avoided the mistakes of others by being wise. Russell argues that education should blend knowledge with values, encouraging people to see themselves as global citizens.

In conclusion, Russell identifies five key elements that lead to wisdom: comprehensiveness, proportionality, freedom from personal biases, fairness, and understanding of human needs. As our knowledge grows, so does our potential to misuse it. Therefore, the need for wisdom is greater than ever to ensure that we use our knowledge for good and fulfill our true purpose in life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BBS First Year English Question Paper with Possible Answers (TU 2021)

PROFESSIONS FOR WOMEN - Virginia Woolf (1882-1941)

Summary : Virginia Adeline Woolf (1882-1941) was an English novelist and essayist, regarded as one of the foremost modernist literary figures of the twentieth century. She was one of the leaders in the literary movement of modernism.  The speech of  Professions for Women  was given in 1931 to the Women’s Service League by Virginia Woolf. It was also included in  Death of a Moth  and  Other Essays  in 1942. Throughout the speech, Virginia Woolf brings forward a problem that is still relevant today:  gender inequality .   Woolf’s main point in this essay was to bring awareness to the phantoms (illusions) and obstacles women face in their jobs. Woolf argues that women must overcome special obstacles to become successful in their careers. She describes two hazards she thinks all women who aspire to professional life must overcome: their tendency to sacrifice their own interests to those of others and their reluctance (hesitancy) to challenge conservative male attitudes .  She starts her

The Etiquette of Freedom - Gary Snyder

  In his essay " The Etiquette of Freedom ," Gary Snyder explores the concept of freedom in relation to nature and culture. He argues that freedom is not simply the absence of constraints (restrictions), but rather the ability to live in harmony with the natural world. This requires a deep understanding of the environment and a willingness to respect its limits. Snyder begins by defining the terms " wild " and " culture ." He argues that " wild " does not mean " untamed " or " uncivilised ," but rather " self-organizing ." A wild system is one that is able to maintain its own equilibrium (balance) without the intervention of humans. Culture, on the other hand, is a human-made system that is designed to meet our needs. Snyder then goes on to discuss the relationship between freedom and culture. He argues that our culture has become increasingly alienated from nature and that this has led to a loss of freedom. We have